Recently I saw an article in a newspaper website where Chetan Bhagat has written something about the “Reality Dance Shows.” The term “Reality Show” is a contradiction, an oxymoron, with less oxygen than what the “oxy” could indicate. Participants are pre-decided, they practise their lives off, come to the venue fully prepared, some even discuss a few things with the judges, and so on. If this is “reality” then I will have nothing of it. At best one can say that such shows are Live shows, even that is probably not correct, as they are all pre-recorded. Reality is when things happen spontaneously, when no one announces them, least of all judges them.
I was tempted to read the blog by Chetan Bhagat. I did and was not convinced that it was actually written by him. Don’t ask me why, the style was not his, that is my overall view. Still, the point that was being blogged about was that dance should not be judged. If not then who will watch them? How can someone make money out of them? The whole idea of judging is not only to create some excitement and competition but to create a whole ambience with emotions riding high, with a studio audience (are they coached prior to the show?) seemingly rapturous, aided ably by some of the judges who, as if on cue, do many things to heat up the happenings on the stage. To an extent that sometimes you start wondering whether there is more action amongst the judges than the action on the stage. Changing reality?
A dance reality show is an experience, and should not be judged for anything else. The TRP is one instrument, to which the TV channels pay a lot of attention, but other things, like good dance moves, the quality of the moves, the sublimity quotient, the index of how positive reactions were generated, and, finally, did everyone go home with a sense of well being and goodness, are other aspects which need to be considered. And not get entangled into arguments as to how the judges were poor in their judgment, how the judges did what the TV channel asked them to do, how things were “pre-fixed” and so on. But you be the judge as to what really happens after the show is over?
While the competition brings about better preparation, newer ideas, revealing newer moves and leads to higher levels of co-ordination, there are other aspects. Chetan blogs mainly based on his personal experiences. But I think that is keeping the circle of experience too close to one’s chest and, when blogging about a reality show, some broader vistas could be viewed and used to enrich content. Else there is a fear that the reality of the dance shows may never really come close to reality. Let’s keep dancing and blogging!
Ratings
Click on a star to rate it!
Rated 0 based on 0 user reviews
No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.
R Jayaraman is a visiting faculty with the Operations, Supply Chain Management and Quantitative Methods (OSCMQM) department at SPJIMR and oversees the Capstone Projects across Executive Management Programmes. He holds a dual master’s degree in applied science from the University of British Columbia, Canada, and in management from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
Pre-trends matter for estimating the causal effect of the WTO on bilateral trade
Read moreBeyond the label: Why consumer vulnerability is a business imperative, not just a policy problem
Read moreIf I already trust life, what role does Īśvara play?
Read moreDo we really need Īśvara? A dialogue with a secular humanist
Read moreWhen the informal economy competes, innovation gets rewritten
Read moreOrganisational responses to hybrid work—Rethinking culture and civility in India
Read moreWhen Amazon arrived late to India’s quick commerce party
Read moreReimagining travel through AI: Making every journey smarter and more personal
Read moreBudget 2025: Unlocking opportunities for the private sector
Read more
